📣 Create Blog for Traders!
Stop Watching news - Start Making it.
START
Kiyosaki's BTC Call is Wrong, But He's Right on ETH
The 'Rich Dad' author sees a crash fueling a crypto surge. Here's why his BTC target is a fantasy, but his ETH prediction misses the real, utility-driven story.

Last time we saw this kind of 'end of the world' macro call was during the COVID crash in March 2020. Everyone panicked, markets dumped, and then hard assets ripped. Robert Kiyosaki is beating that same drum again this week, calling for a global market crash followed by a surge in BTC to $750,000 and ETH to $95,000. While the doom-and-gloom narrative gets clicks, it misses the fundamental shift happening on-chain. Kiyosaki is directionally right—a crisis will push capital into crypto—but he's wrong about the mechanism. This won't be a simple flight to safety; it will be a flight to utility.
Kiyosaki's thesis is straightforward: the traditional financial system is a house of cards, and when it collapses, people will flee to assets that can't be printed. It's a powerful story, and one that has resonated for years. I get it. I was farming YAM at 3 AM back in 2020, I know what market panic feels like. But viewing Bitcoin and Ethereum through the same 'digital gold' lens is a critical mistake.
- Bitcoin (BTC) Target: $750,000
- Ethereum (ETH) Target: $95,000
- Gold Target: $35,000/oz
- Silver Target: ~$200/oz (his metric ton price is confusing)
Let's break down the numbers. For BTC to hit $750,000 from today's price of $74,155, it needs more than a 10x. For a passive, store-of-value asset with a multi-trillion dollar market cap, that requires an unprecedented global capital panic. While Marcus Cole might see echoes of 2018 on the monthly chart, the on-chain data doesn't support a demand shock of that magnitude. Bitcoin's primary use case is holding. It's a digital rock. A very valuable, secure rock, but a rock nonetheless. In a true global crisis, capital doesn't just want to hide—it needs to work.
Conversely, his $95,000 ETH target implies a 40x+ from its current $2,316. This suggests massive outperformance versus Bitcoin. He's accidentally stumbled upon the right conclusion for the wrong reason. The force driving ETH won't just be scarcity; it will be its unstoppable utility as the settlement layer for a parallel financial system.
When the next crisis hits and TradFi rails seize up—when your bank limits withdrawals or your broker halts trading—where will people go? They won't just buy and hold BTC. They will need to borrow, lend, swap, and earn yield. They will need DeFi. I've been tracking TVL across over 50 protocols daily since DeFi summer, and the trend is clear: during volatility, on-chain activity explodes. A market crash will be the ultimate stress test and the ultimate advertisement for decentralized finance.
Forget just buying ETH. Sophisticated capital will be looking for the best DeFi protocols 2026 to put their assets to work. My portfolio reflects this conviction: 30% is in DeFi blue chips like AAVE, UNI, and MKR because they are the banks, exchanges, and central banks of this new world. As billions flow in, a proper DeFi insurance protocols review will become mandatory for anyone with serious size. And the demand for sustainable, secure yield will make a thorough restaking protocols comparison the most valuable research you can do. While a macro analyst like Alex Volkov watches the Fed, I'm watching the on-chain data for MakerDAO's stability module. That's the real central bank to watch.
My entire thesis hinges on DeFi's resilience. I've been burned by three rug pulls in my time, so I read every audit report before I invest a dime. A catastrophic smart contract failure in a core protocol like Aave or EigenLayer could shatter confidence overnight. A coordinated, global regulatory attack targeting stablecoins or on-ramps could also cut off the oxygen. And of course, if the Ethereum network itself fails under the strain, all bets are off. Don't ever think this is a risk-free trade.
Kiyosaki sees a panic into scarce assets. I see a deliberate, calculated migration into productive, decentralized financial infrastructure.
The 'Rich Dad' narrative is simple and appealing, but the future of finance is rarely that simple. The next crash won't just be a replay of the past. It will be an active migration from a fragile, centralized system to a robust, decentralized one. So, when the legacy system finally cracks, are you just buying the digital life raft, or are you investing in the engine that builds the new world?
