logo

📣 Create Blog for Traders!
Stop Watching news - Start Making it.

START
avatarcommunity
Opinions6 hours ago· 5 min read

Fertilizer Prices Spike: Gold or Ag Stocks for the Win?

News of rising fertilizer costs in 2026 has traders scrambling. I'm breaking down the charts on $MOS vs. Gold to see which is the better, cleaner trade.

Everyone sees headlines about rising fertilizer prices and immediately thinks 'inflation trade.' They rush to buy gold, thinking they're front-running the herd. And I think most of them are about to get run over. The real money isn't made on the obvious trade; it's made on the best trade. And right now, the obvious trade isn't the best one.

image

The news hit this morning: Vedomosti reporting that fertilizer export prices are on the rise heading into 2026, citing raw material costs and all the usual geopolitical drama. My phone buzzed with alerts. It's a classic catalyst. But a catalyst without a clean chart is just noise. So instead of blindly buying the inflation narrative, I pulled up two charts: the direct play, fertilizer giant The Mosaic Company ($MOS), and the old guard inflation hedge, Gold futures ($GC).

Let's be honest, the $MOS chart has been an absolute dog for the past year. Just a slow, painful bleed-out. But that's exactly what I love to see. The best reversals come from charts everyone has given up on. For the last few months, it's been building a solid base of support right around the $28.00 level. That's where sellers finally got exhausted.

This is where basic support and resistance trading becomes your best friend. The key level I've had on my whiteboard all week is $32.50. We broke above it this morning on the news, and now I'm stalking an entry on the retest. I want to see price come back down, kiss that $32.50 level, and hold. That's my signal that the breakout is real and not just a news-spike fakeout. The volume pattern on the daily chart is also screaming at me — we're seeing higher-than-average buy volume on this push, confirming conviction. This is one of those simple swing trading strategies that work: wait for the catalyst, identify the key level, and enter on the confirmation.

Then there's gold. The knee-jerk inflation hedge. Everyone from your uncle to macro experts like Alex Volkov loves the long-term story. I get it. But I don't trade stories; I trade price. And right now, the price action in $GC is garbage. It's been stuck in a violent chop-fest between $2,450 and $2,550 for weeks. Getting long here is a coin flip.

If you know how to read candlestick patterns, the 4-hour chart is flashing a warning sign. It looks like a potential bear flag is forming right under resistance. A break below $2,480 could send it tumbling back to the range lows. Could it rip higher? Sure. But the setup lacks clarity. There's no defined, low-risk entry for my style. It's just a 50/50 guess in the middle of a range, and that's how you get chopped to pieces.

  • Clarity of Setup: Winner: $MOS. A clear breakout/retest level vs. Gold's messy range.
  • Risk/Reward: Winner: $MOS. A tight stop under the $32.50 retest targeting $41 offers a much better R:R than buying Gold in the middle of nowhere.
  • Catalyst Purity: Winner: $MOS. It's a direct play on fertilizer prices. Gold is influenced by a million other things, from Fed talk to geopolitics.
  • My Confidence: Winner: $MOS. I've seen this breakout pattern play out a hundred times. I trust it.
***

For me, it's not even a contest. I'm taking the clean setup in $MOS over the coin flip in Gold every single time. I go where the setup is, not where the story is supposed to be. While Sarah Chen might do a deep dive into Mosaic's P/E ratio to confirm the value, my entire thesis rests on the price action at one key level. It's a pure technical trade.

My plan is simple. I'm looking to get long $MOS if it successfully retests $32.50. My stop-loss will go at $30.80, just below the recent swing low. My first target is the gap-fill area around $41.00. That's a potential 4-to-1 risk/reward trade. You won't find that in choppy Gold right now.

Of course, this can all go wrong. If the retest fails and we dump back below $32.00 with heavy volume, the breakout was a fakeout, and my thesis is nuked. I'll take the small loss and move on. The worst thing I could do is revenge trade it, a demon I still fight with according to my trade journal. But the setup is there, and it's a high-probability one worth the risk.

Don't just trade the news, trade the chart's reaction to the news. The market already knows about fertilizer prices; the real edge is in spotting how the big money is positioning itself.
— Jake Morrison

At the end of the day, a thousand narratives are flying around. But price pays. So I have to ask: when a catalyst hits, do you jump on the most popular story, or do you hunt for the cleanest chart? Which one actually grows your account?

GLD chart · Powered by Finviz

33
3Comments